#Reservoir dogs running time movie
#Reservoir dogs running time full

We never know what the hell really happened in that jewelry store and we rely on the first hand accounts of Mr. вЂњReservoir DogsвЂќ throws this theory out the window and instead favors a narrative that has our characters recounting the incidents of the heist and pointing fingers at what went wrong/who ratted them out, but we never see it. What makes вЂњReservoir DogsвЂќ so unique is it breaks up the traditional heist three-act structure where the first act is planning the heist, the second is the heist itself, and the third act is where youвЂ™d unravel the plot. QT was clever and replaced action sequences with dialogue and camera angles that implied more than we saw. DonвЂ™t try and write a large film that requires a lot of money to be made properly, instead write something small. The key to the success of a first film is to write for your budget.

#Reservoir dogs running time full

In the long run, he had a budget, a full crew and a slew of fine talent, but he didnвЂ™t know that while writing it. The story goes that Tarantino wrote вЂњReservoir DogsвЂќ to be cheap he wanted to make a вЂњcheap garage filmвЂќ that would only cost a couple thousand (the money he made for selling his scripts). Even when he had planned to make вЂњReservoir DogsвЂќ he wanted to do it on a miniscule budget. вЂњReservoir DogsвЂќ wasnвЂ™t intended to be his first film, not at all, he had dreams of making вЂњNatural Born KillersвЂќ or вЂњTrue RomanceвЂќ into a micro-budget feature before he sold them. Tarantino was smart, and had big dreams of making movies. ItвЂ™s never easy, but there are methods one can take to make it easier, even just a little. Knocking out your first film is one of the most stress inducing, yet rewarding things a person can partake in and an act that very few people in this world will ever experience.

#Reservoir dogs running time movie

Make sure you and your cinematographer see the same movie in your heads so that both parties have the filmвЂ™s best interest at heart. Dare to be bold when youвЂ™re shot listing your film because sometimes they can pay off. However, these stationary camera angles are some of my favorite. The current school of thinking is that the audience needs to be constantly engaged and this is where the quick paced вЂњMTVвЂќ editing style comes from. Shots like this are always a risk because the theory is that you could lose your audience. Another interesting technique that SekuЕ‚a and Tarantino used was use of long, stationary takes. ItвЂ™s effective, and done in a way that lets the movie play out in our heads. During the infamous вЂњear sceneвЂќ the camera pans away from any real violence while we hear the tortured cop scream out in pain. IвЂ™ve always wondered who had the most input on these decisions.ДЄs I stated earlier, QT planned this movie to be on the cheaper side, and the cinematography reflects that well. вЂњReservoir DogsвЂќ is filled with bold, sleek camera movements and feels very focused. Tarantino, based on what I can see in interviews and the way his films play out, has a very unique, visionary style and itвЂ™s been said he comes to set with every shot planned out meticulously in his head.ДЄnyone who has worked on a film before knows the directorвЂ™s right hand man has to be the cinematographer because if the two arenвЂ™t on the same page, the directorвЂ™s vision wonвЂ™t play out as well. IвЂ™ve always found myself fascinated with the relationship between Quentin Tarantino and his cinematographers, especially in his early films when he was working with Polish cinematographer Andrzej SekuЕ‚a, who shot his early films (вЂњReservoir DogsвЂќ, вЂњPulp FictionвЂќ and вЂњFour RoomsвЂќ) and made his debut working on вЂњReservoir DogsвЂќ. Just because someone is the director on the film doesnвЂ™t mean every decision that comes from their mouth is the right one. DonвЂ™t be afraid to let the actors say вЂњI was thinking I could try thisвЂќ. Look at the opening scene of вЂњReservoir DogsвЂќ where the criminals are all sitting around shooting the shit: itвЂ™s acting gold! You never feel like theyвЂ™re actors who are being paid to deliver lines, because they feel so natural and are bringing their own elements to the characters. When you get a bunch of good actors together in a room, their talents will shine. Some directors like to micro-manage, and at times thatвЂ™s a perfectly acceptable way of making a film, but sometimes the choices the directors donвЂ™t think of that an actor does can be some of the best in the movie. You want an actor who believes in the character written and that can think for himself enough to bring something new and unique to the role. When casting, you of coarse look for an actor whose natural, has good line readings and embodies the character on the page but what some young filmmakers do is they stop looking once an actor has met the previously mentioned criteria. When casting a film, you try and choose the best actors for the role, but a common mistake made with young filmmakers is choosing actors for the wrong reasons.